Comey’s alleged Clinton ‘exoneration assertion’ calls Senate testimony into query

Contemporary allegations that former FBI director James Comey started drafting an “exoneration assertion” for Hillary Clinton nicely earlier than interviewing her and different key witnesses have known as into query his Senate testimony about why he determined to go public together with his findings within the electronic mail case final summer time.

In a June listening to earlier than the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey was requested whether or not his resolution to announce the outcomes of the investigation was influenced by then-Legal professional Common Loretta Lynch’s notorious assembly days earlier on an Arizona tarmac with former President Invoice Clinton.

“Sure, in an finally conclusive method, that was the factor that capped it for me – that I needed to do one thing individually to guard the credibility of the investigation,” Comey informed Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C.

But an Aug. 30 letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., mentioned that interview transcripts present Comey was drafting what they known as an “exoneration assertion” for Clinton weeks earlier.

President Trump, in a Friday tweet, seized on the allegations to assert the method was “rigged.”


Jay Sekulow, a member of Trump’s authorized crew and chief counsel for the American Heart for Regulation and Justice, recommended Comey’s June testimony might be in battle with these new particulars.

“James Comey had the nerve to testify beneath oath that he needed to come ahead final July to make his assertion as a result of the [tarmac meeting] solid doubt on the scope and nature of the investigation,” he informed Fox Information’ “Hannity.” “The very fact is, evidently, he already made up his thoughts three months earlier than the investigation actually acquired underway, so this complete factor was a fraud on the American individuals.”

The transcripts in query had been from interviews performed by the Workplace of Particular Counsel, which interviewed James Rybicki, Comey’s chief of employees, and Trisha Anderson, the principal deputy common counsel of nationwide safety and cyberlaw, the GOP senators mentioned.

The notes replicate claims that Comey “wrote a draft” of his assertion round early Might 2016.

One other passage suggests Comey despatched round a draft in an try and be “forward-leaning” given the “course the investigation” was headed.

It’s attainable that Comey drafted a press release meant for public launch at a future date, however didn’t determine to ship an on-camera assertion till the tarmac assembly.

Comey, whom Trump fired in Might amid tensions over the Russia probe, additionally testified in June there have been “different issues” that contributed to his resolution to go public, together with Lynch allegedly urging him to confer with the e-mail probe as a “matter” and never an “investigation.”

“That was one of many bricks within the load that led me to conclude I’ve to step away from the division” as a way to shut the case “credibly,” he mentioned.

A Comey contact informed Fox Information on Friday that the previous FBI director had no remark, when requested in regards to the new allegations. It stays unclear whether or not Comey may have drafted the same assertion for a state of affairs by which prices can be filed towards Clinton.

The Grassley-Graham letter, nonetheless, displays no such assertion.

In his July 2016 announcement, Comey famously known as Clinton’s electronic mail association “extraordinarily careless” although he determined towards recommending legal prices.

The brand new claims have, at a minimal, revived curiosity amongst Clinton’s critics in revisiting elements of the case.

Simply final month, practically two-dozen Republicans known as on the Trump Justice Division to call a second particular counsel – alongside the Robert Mueller crew probing allegations of Russia-Trump crew collusion – to probe 2016 controversies involving Clinton and the Obama administration. This lined some elements of the FBI and DOJ’s dealing with of the investigation.

Requested about that request, a Justice Division official mentioned Friday, “We now have obtained the letter.”

Earlier this week, the FBI declined to show over recordsdata associated to its Clinton electronic mail investigation by arguing there was an absence of public curiosity within the situation. The argument was made in a Freedom of Data Act information request.

Fox Information’ Brooke Singman and Alex Pappas contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    is typing...

    Fill in the form below to send us a message.

    Send Message Cancel